Repository | Journal | Volume | Article
Reversing 30 years of discussion
why causal decision theorists should one-box
pp. 95-122
Abstract
The paper will show how one may rationalize one-boxing in Newcomb’s problem and drinking the toxin in the Toxin puzzle within the confines of causal decision theory by ascending to so-called reflexive decision models which reflect how actions are caused by decision situations (beliefs, desires, and intentions) represented by ordinary unreflexive decision models.
Publication details
Published in:
Arló Costa Horacio, Helzner Jeffrey (2012) More foundations of the decision sciences. Synthese 187 (1).
Pages: 95-122
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-011-0023-5
Full citation:
Spohn Wolfgang (2012) „Reversing 30 years of discussion: why causal decision theorists should one-box“. Synthese 187 (1), 95–122.