Communities of Dialogue Russian and Ukrainian Émigrés in Modernist Prague

Repository | Journal | Volume | Article

234849

Phylogenetic inference to the best explanation and the bad lot argument

Aleta Quinn

pp. 3025-3039

Abstract

I respond to the bad lot argument in the context of biological systematics. The response relies on the historical nature of biological systematics and on the availability of pattern explanations. The basic assumption of common descent enables systematic methodology to naturally generate candidate explanatory hypotheses. However, systematists face a related challenge in the issue of character analysis. Character analysis is the central problem for contemporary systematics, yet the general problem of which it is a case—what counts as evidence?—has not been adequately discussed by proponents of inference to the best explanation. Facing this problem is the price of adopting abductive methods. I sketch an account of how systematists approach the problem of evidence.

Publication details

Published in:

(2016) Synthese 193 (9).

Pages: 3025-3039

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0908-9

Full citation:

Quinn Aleta (2016) „Phylogenetic inference to the best explanation and the bad lot argument“. Synthese 193 (9), 3025–3039.