Repository | Book | Chapter
Reply to Shimony
pp. 115-118
Abstract
Professor Shimony's fair comment on my paper provides me with an opportunity to clarify some points which because of their concise presentation may not appear entirely clear. I am glad to note that there are some large areas of agreement between us while the differences of view — some of them at least — are apparently due to misunderstanding rather than to the lack of agreement. I am going to comment on his comments in the same order in which he formulated them.
Publication details
Published in:
Shimony Abner, Nails Debra (1987) Naturalistic epistemology: a symposium of two decades. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 115-118
Full citation:
Čapek Milič (1987) „Reply to Shimony“, In: A. Shimony & D. Nails (eds.), Naturalistic epistemology, Dordrecht, Springer, 115–118.