Repository | Book | Chapter
Rational intuitions and the irrelevance of experimental philosophy
pp. 233-245
Abstract
Philosophical intuition. .. is e piste mo logically useless, since it can be calibrated only when it is not needed. Once we are in a position to identify artifacts and errors in intuition, philosophy no longer has any use for it. Moreover, the most plausible account of the origins of philosophical intuitions is that they derive from tacit theories that are very likely to be inaccurate. There is a sense, then, in which philosophical intuitions can always be "explained away": when a dispute arises, I can always, with some plausibility, suppose your intuitions are the artifacts of bad tacit theory. This is a game everyone can play, and I think we should all play it. We should, that is, dismiss philosophical intuitions as epistemologically valueless.
Publication details
Published in:
Chapman Andrew, Ellis Addison, Hanna Robert, Pickford Henry (2013) In defense of intuitions: a new rationalist manifesto. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 233-245
Full citation:
Chapman Andrew, Ellis Addison, Hanna Robert, Hildebrand Tyler, Pickford Henry (2013) Rational intuitions and the irrelevance of experimental philosophy, In: In defense of intuitions, Dordrecht, Springer, 233–245.