Repository | Book | Chapter
The case for explanation continued
a reply to professor Tugendhat
pp. 267-272
Abstract
The attempt to reply to a reply may seem inelegant; in the present case, however, I see it as necessary. Professor Tugendhat has presented his view of philosophy with great clarity, and related it to mine by criticism. I wish in turn to present my view through the criticism of his; if you like, I wish to complete the circle of debate.
Publication details
Published in:
Mays Wolfe (1972) Linguistic analysis and phenomenology. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 267-272
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01215-2_19
Full citation:
Pettit Philip (1972) „The case for explanation continued: a reply to professor Tugendhat“, In: W. Mays (ed.), Linguistic analysis and phenomenology, Dordrecht, Springer, 267–272.