Repository | Journal | Volume | Article
Perestrojka and literature
texts and context
pp. 189-204
Abstract
Are any conclusions to be had? We have shown how, at all levels, the system of Soviet literature, has both persisted and fallen into disrepair. The rigid model of socialist realism that took hold during the Ždanovist period no longer exists. However, its presence is still felt not only as a constant negative point of reference, but through the numerous structures that grew out of it. Changes set in motion during the thaw continue at an accelerated pace for the sake ofperestrojka. All the same, five years later the latter has yet to achieve its literary revolution.There is one fundamental change. It would be an anachronism to organize today a conference on "One or two Russian literatures?," as in Geneva some years ago. But will this merging of the separate branches of Russian literature go beyond confusion in the direction of a development describable as "organic"? Will the different components of the transformed system become compatible?Only time will tell and, it is hoped, dispell our doubts.
Publication details
Published in:
(1990) Studies in East European Thought 40 (1-3).
Pages: 189-204
DOI: 10.1007/BF00818978
Full citation:
Heller Leonid (1990) „Perestrojka and literature: texts and context“. Studies in East European Thought 40 (1-3), 189–204.