Repository | Book | Chapter
Truth-makers and convention T
pp. 79-84
Abstract
This chapter discusses the place, if any, of Convention T (the condition of material adequacy of the proper definition of truth formulated by Alfred Tarski) in the truth-makers account offered by Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons, and Barry Smith. It is argued that although Tarski's requirement seems entirely acceptable in the frameworks of truth-maker theories at first sight, several doubts arise under a closer inspection. In particular, T-biconditionals have no clear meaning as sentences about truth-makers. Thus, the truth-maker theory cannot be considered as the semantic theory of truth enriched by metaphysical (ontological) data. The problem of truth-makers for sentences about future events is discussed at the end of this chapter.
Publication details
Published in:
Reboul Anne (2014) Mind, values, and metaphysics I: philosophical essays in honor of Kevin Mulligan. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 79-84
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_5
Full citation:
Woleński Jan (2014) „Truth-makers and convention T“, In: A. Reboul (ed.), Mind, values, and metaphysics I, Dordrecht, Springer, 79–84.