Communities of Dialogue Russian and Ukrainian Émigrés in Modernist Prague

Repository | Series | Book | Chapter

148706

Critical remarks to Mead's theory of intersubjectivity

Steven Vaitkus

pp. 31-42

Abstract

No doubt, in the presentation of Mead's conception of intersubjectivity which has been given above, it is obvious that many of the themes connected with the pragmatic strain of his work have not been explicitly taken up for analysis and belabored. Among other viewpoints, Mead did appropriate the pragmatic and it is one which does stretch throughout much of his life work. Hans Joas has devoted an excellent study to this particular aspect of Mead's work, in relationship to the problem of intersubjectivity, and has made the first attempts to work out a notion of what he has aptly termed "praktische Intersubjektivität".1 However, Mead's work went well beyond the pragmatic viewpoint as is evident in the following passages.

Publication details

Published in:

Vaitkus Steven (1991) How is society possible?: intersubjectivity and the fiduciary attitude as problems of the social group in Mead, Gurwitsch, and Schutz. Dordrecht, Springer.

Pages: 31-42

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2077-4_3

Full citation:

Vaitkus Steven (1991) Critical remarks to Mead's theory of intersubjectivity, In: How is society possible?, Dordrecht, Springer, 31–42.